What's News?


Pineapple not too awkward for pizza


pineappleBELONGSonpizza (1)

Graphic by Maria Suarez


By Maria Suarez, Asst. Section Editor

The biggest argument used to be whether pizza was created by Italians, but it actually originated in the ancient times in the Middle East. History proves that the Greeks, Egyptians, Armenians, Babylonians and Israelites began by making flatbread in mud ovens and topping the bread with olive oil and spices, now known as focaccia.

It wasn’t until 1522, when tomatoes were brought into Europe from Peru, that the poor –and hungry — people of Naples found themselves placing the thought-to-be-poisonous fruit on top of their yeast dough, the first modern pizza.

After having found the answer to that problem, all other doubts and questions about pizza had been put aside, and the world of pizza had come to a peace.

The peace was interrupted when Gudni Johannesson, the president of Iceland, declared while taking questions from students at a school he was visiting that he would ban putting pineapple on pizzas. And much like a wildfire, a controversy erupted and all pineapple pizza lovers united to defend themselves.

As a pineapple pizza enthusiast myself, pineapple has all the right to go on as a topping. If tomatoes, which are also a fruit, can go on top, what can stop pineapple tidbits from joining the rest of the toppings list?

Pineapple tidbits add a touch of sweetness and savory in every bite. Pineapple as a whole is very healthy and is a source of vitamin C, manganese and dietary fiber. Therefore, piling a couple of pineapple tidbits onto your pizza can make you feel a little less guilty about eating it.

Shockingly enough, according to a Huffington Post infographic, “The Top 10 Most Popular Pizza Toppings,” pineapple came in at ninth place, followed by spinach. If we allow mushrooms, which are neither fruit nor vegetable but fungus, to go acceptably on top of pizza, why can’t pineapples have the same liberty?

All it takes is an open mind and a hungry stomach to agree that pineapple isn’t as bad as you may think. Chef Anthony Carron of 800 Degrees Pizzeria, an opponent of pineapple pizza, gave in to the idea after receiving multiple orders of pineapple topping, one of the few ingredients his restaurant didn’t carry.

According to writer Chelsea Ritchel from The Independent, Carron now accepts pineapple only under one condition: no “garbage canned pineapple tidbits,” rather fresh ones that are hand-peeled and -diced, then tossed with extra virgin olive oil and sea salt before being roasted in a wood-burning oven until they are caramelized.

Still have a problem? To every problem there’s a solution. Pizzarias allow for pizzas to be split in half with the left and right sides with different toppings.

So for picky eaters out there, next time you’re going to share a pizza with a pineapple pizza enthusiast, you can either pick the pineapple tidbits right off your slice of pizza, or simply order pizza with half pineapple tidbits and the other with your preferred toppings.

That said, I hope we can all agree that dipping pizza in milk, which is an actual thing, is an utter disgrace.

Posted: Apr. 21

Don’t let Douglas become another statistic


By Jordan Brown, Section Editor

It’s been over a month since the Valentine’s Day massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and media coverage of potential legislature or just general precautions to prevent another shooting from happening has slowed to a crawl.

In the weeks following the shooting, many Americans were fired up for change and ready to make history by pushing back against the lazy politicians and pushing forward for a change in legislation. But as more days passed, the more the fire extinguished. Newspapers stopped covering it, politicians introduced completely unrelated bills and proposals, and schools across the country got tired of all the students walking out of classes for peaceful protest.

America is known for focusing on something for a few days and then throwing it to the side to focus on something else that catches its eye, much like a hyperactive child. We, as students, have an obligation to make sure that America’s short attention span doesn’t turn to something else when we haven’t gotten justice for the 17 lives we lost in that shooting. We acknowledge and are grateful for the steps that have been taken towards the goal of justice for those families and our community. But that’s just it; they’re just steps. There’s much more that needs to be done and politicians are stalling because they think that we’re placated by the baby steps they’ve taken towards completing our goal.

Legislation regarding guns and school safety should’ve been changed when Columbine happened in 1999, but it wasn’t. Legislation should’ve been changed when Sandy Hook happened in 2012, but it wasn’t. Why? Because the media, politicians and ordinary citizens allowed it to fade away after just a few moments in the spotlight.

Ways to keep the conversation going is to continue to plan marches to your local city hall, contacting your representatives, and joining other schools’ activism. Douglas survivors Emma Gonzalez, Sarah Chadwick, David Hogg and Cameron Kasky use their immense social media following to plan, organize and advocate for the prevention of gun violence and for the safety of students around the country.

Thousands of people went to planned marches and walkouts nationwide in the past month because students like Gonzalez, Hogg, Kasky and Chadwick took action, standing up for what they believe is right. The march on Washington that took place on March 24, fittingly called March For Our Lives, grew from people marching to the nation’s capitol to people marching to their government buildings on every single continent.

We have to keep talking about it, we have to keep bringing it up, or else it’ll fade into the background and become another statistic. This time will be different, this time has to be different.

Posted: Apr. 10

If you want change, go vote


By Samuel Rosser, Staff Writer

Republicans in the state Capitol shot down a measure to ban assault rifles last week, and, on Feb. 26 Republicans in the U. S. Senate killed a bill to ban assault rifles nationwide. An AR-15 assault rifle is what Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 innocent students, teachers and staff at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14.

The president of the United States of America is sending his daughter, a fashion designer, to negotiate one of the most complicated international relationships the United States has ever seen on behalf of a nation of 320 million. That president has been under investigation since day one of his administration. Republicans have control of the White House and a majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and yet, they struggle to legislate effectively.

Republicans have broken promises, lived under constant scandal and failed to make anybody besides the wealthiest Americans’ lives better. It’s time to vote them out.

Democrats harbor a 9-point lead in the generic congressional ballot, which is simply a choice between a Republican or a Democrat, according to Real Clear Politics. Donald Trump’s approval rating is hovering in the high 30s to low 40s, and the respected statisticians and political operatives at FiveThirtyEight think there are a whopping 18 gubernatorial races Democrats can pick up from Republicans this year — including Florida.

None of this can be done, however, if our generation does not go vote. Our generation is socially liberal, we believe the climate is changing because of human action and we favor higher taxes on the wealthiest among us. However, we’re infamous for our laziness. You might wonder what we’ve done to deserve that label, but they’re right.

We don’t go vote. In the last midterm election, only one out of six citizens 18-29 voted. Only 16 percent of our generation voted. Sixteen. Comparatively, half of our grandparents’ generation voted, and our grandparents make up roughly the same percentage of the electorate as we do.

I know I’m not the only one who’s been sitting at the Thanksgiving table sitting quietly while our nearly senile grandfather goes on about the “good old days.” Well, our senile grandparents still get to vote, and they have nothing better to do on a Tuesday in November. Well, we get to vote too. So go and vote.

Posted: Mar. 6

PRO: Gun control can save lives


By Alexandra Griffin, Editor-in-Chief

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

The preamble to the Constitution clearly states the purpose of the document.  In light of the tragic shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas on Feb. 14 and the eight other school shootings in the first six weeks of 2018, the Second Amendment is no longer upholding this purpose.

A “more perfect Union” is not one where innocent children get chased down and killed by their disturbed peers. To “establish Justice” for those fallen is not “sending thoughts and prayers”. To “insure domestic Tranquility” is not having kids’ best friends shot in front of them in a “safe space.” To “provide for the common defense” is not allowing a person who is barely an adult and is known to be disturbed to legally purchase a semi-automatic war weapon. To “promote the general Welfare” is not ignoring the voice of the people and ignoring our cries for gun control. And “the Blessings of Liberty” are not to send eight-year-olds to school fearful that a school shooter or armed teacher will shoot them.

While I respect the Second Amendment and our forefathers who created it, times have changed. The Second Amendment is just that, an amendment, and it wouldn’t be the first time that as a country, we amend the constitution. If we can get rid of Prohibition, we can enact gun control, not banning guns, gun control.

We need mental health checks other than a simple checkbox on a form that does not need to be verified by anyone. We need a ban on assault rifles. We need to ensure that there is not another person that has their life ripped away from them while sitting helplessly in school.

As students, we cannot sit by idly. We must be the difference. If we want change, we must be the ones to make it. We must join forces with our peers at MSD and fight for our lives, for gun control.

Write your representatives, senators, and president, walk out for school organized walk-outs, march for your life on March 24 in cities all over. Be the change we want and need.

Posted: Mar. 5

CON: Controlling guns means controlling the people


By Jessica Buchanan, Managing Editor

The Second Amendment was created with the security of our people at the forefront of the framer’s minds. Since its passage in 1791, the amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

In the wake of a tragic mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, community members took immediate action to enact gun control laws on the general population, specifically the banning of automatic and semi-automatic assault rifles. However, gun control and an assault weapons ban will not prevent the problem from occurring again.

The definition of a well-regulated militia then and today might have changed but the foundation is still there. A well-regulated militia should allow for any legal U.S. male or female citizen to obtain a firearm as long as they pass the required background checks and are of legal age.

It is the “right of the people,” the individual person, to own a firearm, not the state or national government to declare what they think is best.

As citizens we are held accountable for our own personal safety. By placing gun control laws on those that want to obtain a firearm, their right automatically becomes infringed upon and the Second Amendment is no longer upheld.

I do not disagree with the fact that Nikolas Cruz in the Douglas shooting should not have been able to get his hands on an AR-15, with the mental condition he was in, but when it comes right down to it the AR-15 did not pick itself up and pull the trigger. It took Nikolas Cruz to commit that action and he along with the failure of law enforcement and his guardians to take away his guns should be held solely responsible. It takes a person to fire a gun, not the gun itself.

Therefore the issue does not lie in an assault weapons ban. The assault weapons ban that was in place from 1994-2004 did little to deter crime, which is why it was not reinstated when it expired. According to the FBI murder weapon statistics, only 3 percent of firearm murders were committed using rifles.  If an assault weapons ban were to be passed by legislation it would essentially only be preventing 3 percent of murders by firearm.

If the right to bear arms is torn away from the citizens of the United States, then there will be no way of protection when another incident happens.

The truth of the matter is that if someone wants to get ahold of anything illegal, then they will find a way to do it. 1.2 million Americans each year are arrested for possession of drugs according to the Drug Policy Alliance, and millions more go unaccounted for. Possession of an illegal firearm would not be decreased due to legislation.

Laws such as an assault weapons ban and increased age to own a firearm take guns away from those who respect and abide by the law. Criminals who are intent on doing harm will find a way to obtain a firearm whichever way, leaving a country where its citizens are defenseless.

There have been countless times where individuals with a concealed weapons permit have been able to save the lives of many. On average it takes 11 minutes for police to respond to an emergency call.

What can happen in 11 minutes if a gunman opens fire in a school, mall, movie theater or anywhere and no one has protection from an equally powerful weapon? How would the situation be different if just one citizen had a gun?

In 2014, a psychiatric patient opened fire on his caseworker, psychiatrist and several others in the office. This psychiatric patient shot and killed his case worker, but was shot himself by his psychiatrist carrying a concealed weapon.

The patient had 39 more bullets of ammo, but was stopped because that one person had a weapon.

“If the doctor did not have a firearm, (and) the doctor did not utilize the firearm, he’d be dead today, and I believe that other people in the facility would also be dead,” Delaware County District Attorney Jack Whelan said, according to National Public Radio.

We need to stop talking about gun control laws and start taking action to make areas safer. Mass shootings have repeatedly occurred in gun-free zones. According to Crime Prevention Research Center, 98 percent of all mass shootings occur in gun-free zones. Las Vegas, Pulse nightclub, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, four of the deadliest mass shootings, have all occurred in gun-free zones. Now the shooting at Douglas has occurred in a gun-free zone.

Disarming people is like taking a leg from a gazelle thinking the cheetahs won’t attack it anymore because they know it’s an unfair advantage. Predators prey on the weak. Gun control laws will indeed make it harder for people to obtain firearms, but they will inevitably make it easier for those who obtain guns for malicious purposes to kill the vulnerable, powerless and those that obey the laws.

Posted Mar. 5

Clean campus breeds ignorance


By Madison Steinkamp, Asst. Section Editor

I have a theory. My theory is that no one a part of administration ever ventures down Sixth Street (the road our buses drive down to get to the bus loop). Why?

Well, have you ever ventured down that road and looked at the ground? Have you ever walked to the junior parking lot? If you have, you know exactly what I am going to be talking about. The trash. Not just trash in general, which is plentiful, but the beer bottles, beer cans and liquor bottles, all empty but still on our school.

Of course, our campus is an open campus and does host events besides school events, but doesn’t it seem ironic that we advocate a drug-free school (which does include alcohol), yet show no enthusiasm to clean our school to replicate the drug-free mentality?

I walked from the junior lot to the bus loop today and counted two beer cans, three beer bottles and two liquor bottles, one of which was directly next to the elementary school fence.

I’m not blaming our students or staff for bringing the alcohol onto our school grounds. I understand that it may have been brought in another way, but what I am complaining about is how it continues to lie there.

How helpful is an assembly advocating against drunk-driving when you just walk to your car and see our school littered with alcohol? Everything the student just listened to in that assembly is forgotten. If there is alcohol on my school grounds, why can’t I drink it?

By leaving alcohol containers on the ground, we aren’t just littering the earth, we are littering minds by, in a way, promoting the consumption of alcohol.

This littering is not the fault of our janitorial staff, nor the administration, nor the students, nor the city. Maybe it is the city’s for not cleaning up after hosting an event, maybe some students do chug a beer before school and litter it, maybe the administration does not walk to the junior lot to see this, maybe the janitorial staff thinks that path is the least of their worries, but it’s not just one person or one group’s fault; as an entity we all should be working to better our school, we all should care about the trash on our grounds, we all should do something about it.

Regardless of who brought the alcohol onto the grounds, it needs to be picked up, and I don’t care who does it, just clean the path.  

Posted: Mar. 5

Fresh start: Ninth-graders describe transition, pan mentoring


By Emily Powell, Web and Business Editor

A quick survey shows that the class of 2021 have different views on their transition from middle school to high school, most describing it as “somewhat positive” with “little help from their mentors and staff.”

Graduating from middle school is a great achievement, but as we continue to grow and transition, school can become more difficult. The school becomes bigger, the work gets harder, the teachers seem stricter — it’s basically a fresh start.

As a freshman two years ago, my transition was kind of tough, considering I was the only one out of my middle school friend group to get accepted into Pompano. I had no friends and didn’t know where I was going or what I was doing. I had to fend for myself until things finally fell into place.These freshmen, though? They are persistent; they just may survive high school.

Kyle Zahn was the only freshman out of the groups surveyed to say that his transition was very positive. Zahn attended Deerfield Beach Middle School and was a part of the International Baccalaureate (IB) program, which he thinks helped with his transition.

“The workload was about the same as this, and the IB program really helped me prepare for Pompano Beach High School,” Zahn said.

Other freshmen saw their transition differently. Paul Spade, for example, was one of the many freshmen who described their transition as somewhat positive, mentioning how useless the mentoring program is in easing this dramatic change in their lives.

“Mentors don’t really do anything, and they can’t relate to us,” Spade said.

Jon-David Delcastillo had similar views as Spade, also describing his transition as somewhat positive in spite of the mentoring program.

“Freshmen don’t really want to do anything at the mentoring sessions,” Delcastillo said. “Mentors do nothing, anyway.”

The current freshman class feels that they have not been given enough help to ease their transition into high school, but the mentors have their own opinions on this. They feel that the freshmen don’t want or won’t ask for their mentors’ help despite having it. Mentors feel that there is room for improvement with the program, though, and shared their thoughts on the matter.

Senior Katerina Argianas suggested that the program would be more effective if mentors were assigned to fewer kids than they’re assigned to now, such as providing one mentor for two kids instead of one mentor for five.

“Doing this would allow more people to communicate with each other,” Argianas said.

Junior Matthew Narkier also recommended that there should be fewer activities and more bonding between mentees, since they’ve agreed that the program is “boring.”

“We should be able to talk to them and hang out with them,” Narkier said. “I feel like they kind of feel like it’s more of a ‘work thing’ whenever we see them because they’re always doing little projects and stuff like that.”

So, freshmen, help is here for you. Please, don’t be afraid to ask!

Posted: Jan. 31

School vouchers for bullied students to compound bullying problem, not solve it

By Alexandra Griffin, Editor-in-Chief

A proposal reached the Florida Senate on Jan. 23 which would use taxpayer money to provide bullied students with school vouchers so they can attend private school. Doing so will not only compound the bullying problem, but will be costly to the state budget, a budget that already under-funds public schools.  

While bullying is terrible and I hope that nobody ever has to go through being bullied or feels like they need to be a bully, if you are involved, it’s not a problem from which you can just run away as the legislature proposes. Confronting bullies and pushing through the experience promotes the problem solving and collaboration techniques that life in college and the workforce demand.

The bill teaches students who are bullied that they do not have to live in an environment that is hostile or unfriendly when the legislators making the bill know first hand that people can be cut-throat and unkind. An elected official cannot just resign from office after he loses an important debate or is called out by an opposing party member, so why propose we train the next generation to do so?

Letting victims of bullying run away from their bully/bullies also makes the perpetrator(s) more likely to target another student. If culprits are never chastised or never realize that their actions are wrong, how are they supposed to fix them?

Additionally, by approving the bill the state government would be throwing its support at private schools that do not pay their teachers as much, do not have a better education than public schools and do not necessarily have a better solution to bullies than public schools have. In fact, out of the top 10 schools in the state only a third of them are private according to the U.S. News and World Report.

The solution is easy: allocate those funds from the school vouchers to programs that help to make students’ voices heard. There is no way to fully outlaw bullying without taking away freedom of speech, but students will feel better if they have someone to talk to and someone to help them solve the problem in a safe and healthy manner.

Posted: Jan. 30


Parents pressure for peak performance

By Emily Powell, Web and Business Editor

A survey of 80 students showed that most parents get mad when their children get poor grades on assignments, even though a majority of students said they don’t feel stressed because of their parents’ feelings.

Parents want us to succeed no matter what we’re doing, whether it be playing a sport, having a job, you name it. That’s just what they do. Parents love watching their kids win their games or come home with a paycheck, but they especially love when their kids are excelling in their academic studies.

But sometimes the pressure is too much.

“When my parents yell at me because of my grades, it makes me feel like I’m not trying hard enough and think there is no use for even trying in school anymore,” junior Brinya Kydd said.

Many students would love to have Kydd’s grades, yet she still feels the pressure. But is that pressure healthy? Even the students whose unweighted GPAs fall below the magnet-required 2.5 will say that the conference with magnet coordinator Jeff Williams and their counselor has worked better than being scolded by their parents.

The students’ responses to the survey show ninth and tenth graders feel obligated to have “perfect grades” because of pressure from their parents. However, as the grade level of students increases, the students feel less responsive to parental pressure.

As we get older, the effectiveness of parental pressure decreases. So, parents, please, lighten up!

Posted: Nov. 30

Mass shootings, gun control

Change won’t come unless we embrace it


Graphic by Kristina Latchana

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA — A man opened fire on a country music festival from his room in the Mandalay Bay hotel on the Las Vegas Strip. This was the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history. He reportedly had upwards of 20 guns in his hotel room. His firearms were outfitted with scopes, tripods and attachments that converted his semi-automatic weapons into automatic weapons.

He set up shop in his hotel room, schlepping his mobile arsenal with him. He loaded multiple weapons, broke open the window, aimed down the sight, put his finger on the trigger and had yet to commit a crime. The absolute insanity of that is baffling.

Nearly every member of Congress and our dear president sent their thoughts and prayers to those who lost loved ones in Las Vegas earlier this month. Their thoughts and prayers won’t prevent any equally as disturbed gunman from doing something eerily similar to the appalling actions of Sunday night.What will prevent senseless violence and dismay is a policy change.

Despite knowing how new regulations on guns can save lives, they refuse to make a change. The National Rifle Association has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on campaigns in the 2016 election cycle alone. The donations range from state legislatures to the highest office in the land. The candidate with the most money in his campaign war chest usually takes the bacon on Election Day.

Thus, the NRA has most of Congress’ metaphorical balls in a vice grip. None is going to risk losing NRA endorsement to challenge the status quo. That’s not to say that we wouldn’t applaud any such rabble rouser.  Change is on a horizon that we can’t even glimpse yet.

Their stubborn refusal of change represents our nation as a whole. In our relatively short history, we have resisted change at every turn. It took us way too long to outlaw slavery.

We need to stop resisting change at every turn. Our country’s foundation is the most radical change in history. We inspired the world to change in ways that were unimaginable at that point. The world has looked at us for the past century for leadership, and, right now, we’re failing. We were the shining city on the hill. But at this rate we might become the town dump.

Don’t resist change, embrace it.

Posted: Oct. 23

Pro-con: President Trump’s accomplishments

opprocontrumpgraphicfixed_BlacJ (1)

Commander in change makes us great again

By Madison Steinkamp, Asst. Section Editor

The United States of America is a business, as corporate and cold as that may seem to refer to our country and home as, it is true. And in November 2016, when Donald Trump was elected president, it proved that the majority of Americans think so too. Unlike his competitor Hillary Clinton, Trump had no experience in the world of politics; he was never a governor nor a senator nor a mayor, but he did have the experience that matters: business experience.

Worth $3.5 billion according to Forbes, Trump knows how to run a company and profit from it, and that is just what he is doing for the United States. Although the world expected more change at a much faster pace, he was left with the ruins of America after President Barack Obama contributed $7.9 trillion to the national debt.

Housing prices are rising since Trump took office, according to CNN. As of June 2017, the average price for a home was a record $263,800, 5.8 percent higher than a year ago.

And although the trade deficit with China has risen, Trump has increased exports to Canada and Mexico.

Speaking of foreign countries, Trump ended Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, but has given Congress six months to rewrite it until the undocumented “Dreamers” official lose their status.

Many people have slammed Trump for this decision, something that definitely shouldn’t be happening.

While many Americans are friends with and love Dreamers, we need to remember that they are illegal, undocumented immigrants, and we are Americans. While it may seem harsh to put ourselves first, in this unforgiving world, Americans must come first.

We need to fix our economy, our nation, our home before we are capable of housing others. And once we fix ourselves first, the next people we should let in are not undocumented illegal immigrants, but the immigrants who have applied for citizenship and are waiting in a line, not just hopping a border, a border that will be safer and better soon.

In order to prevent more illegal immigrants from coming in and destroying our economy and taking our jobs once again, Trump plans to create a wall at least 18 feet tall, with an unbreachable six feet below ground.

And while some Americans are completely against this wall, and others believe it will never actually happen, it will.

Two prototypes will soon begin construction in San Diego: one is a completely concrete wall, while the other is more mesh-like see and through.

And Trump’s plans to help America first are working as well. Since taking office, the unemployment rate is at an all time low from the past 16 years, 4.5 percent, according to CNBC. Over 1 million jobs have been created, and in the past 12 months, CNN reports, the average hourly wage has increased 2.5 percent.

So no, Trump hasn’t been systematically destroying our country since January — he has been running our country, boosting our economy, protecting Americans and changing our nation, some things that haven’t been done since before Obama went into office.

Liar in Chief fails to make any deals

By Sam Rosser, Asst. Section Editor

What has Donald Trump actually done? The short answer is this: a lot.

He’s announced that the United States would be pulling out of the Paris Climate Accords — a deal the United States was integral in making. He’s rolled back environmental regulations that President Obama set. He’s failed to corral Congress to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program. He’s escalated tensions with North Korea.

His crowning non-achievement? He’s failed, not once, not twice, but three times at one of his prime campaign promises: to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

He is supposed to be the best deal-maker in the country, and yet, he has failed to make a single legislative accomplishment.

Keep in mind, both the House and the Senate are controlled by Republicans. He can’t even make a deal with members of his own party. The supposed best deal-maker in America can’t make a single deal.

This failure could be for a host of reasons. Foremost of which, he has no political clout.

A majority of Americans have disapproved of his presidency since mid-February. And a majority of Americans have never approved of the work he’s doing. It’s hard to make a deal when nobody likes you.

And, to boot, he’s a pathological liar. According to PolitiFact, about 70 percent of what he states is either “mostly false,” “false” or “pants on fire.” Most recently, he lied about his new tax plan he’s rolling out. He claimed, falsely, that millions of small business owners and farmers would benefit from this.

Frankly, they won’t. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found that, in 2017, only about 80 farms or closely-held small businesses would pay any estate tax.

He also claimed that he would reap no benefit from this new tax policy. Again, he blatantly spewed a lie with no regard for the truth. The New York Times found that he would save an estimated $1.1 billion if his plan became law.

Donald Trump has made hollow promises time and time again. When will the 38 percent of Americans who support him realize that he is a pathological liar that can’t follow through on his promises? 

Posted Oct. 20

Rocketman vs. Cheeto threatens WW3

By Julia Latchana, Assistant Editor

Maybe we should limit the child’s play going on the world stage. Or should I say playground?

Ever since Donald Trump began his presidency, he has been butting heads with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, most recently in a response to the dictator’s testing of nuclear weapons and the “success” of their hydrogen bomb testing.

As a response, Trump called Kim Jong Un “Rocket Man” during a speech to the United Nations on Sept. 19, trying to get the dictator to stop his nuclear testing and echoing his tweet on Sept. 17: “I spoke with President Moon of South Korea last night. Asked him how Rocket Man is doing. Long gas lines forming in North Korea. Too bad!”.

This then led to Kim to retort, with a variety of nicknames for Trump including “mentally deranged,” “dotard” and a “barking dog.” Trump then responded by saying that Kim is “obviously a madman.”

The North Korean dictator is not dimwitted, as we Americans would like to think.

Okay, so maybe Kim did feed his uncle to dogs so he could obtain power, but as the “grandson of a god” he can do whatever he likes, meaning that his loyal citizens may not give a damn, which is frankly good for him.

However, President Donald Trump might not have his hat on the right way.

Since taking presidency— and a little bit before that— Trump has done some questionable things without thinking about how they affect all the American people, and not just the business side of things.

I believe that this is a fight that neither side will be able to win. If Kim Jong Un were to shoot nuclear missiles at the United States, more than half of the country would likely be devastated. On the other hand, if the United States  strikes first, the ensuring war would destroy not only North Korea, but South Korea — a U. S. ally. That would then cause China, and maybe Russia, to throw a missile our way.

Either way, we’d be screwed.

If you were to take out all of the political factors attached to this dilemma, and a nuclear warhead were aimed and shot, the destination would be utterly decimated. The warhead wrecking the land when it hits its target is already big problem, but the after effects would be worse. Some living things will die as soon or right after it hits, but the living things that don’t die, will most likely get cancer or radiation poisoning.

Even if we didn’t have Trump as our current president, the threat of nuclear strikes between the two countries would still be possible because of the U. S. stance on North Korea and how we helped protect South Korea from invasion.

With Trump, the inevitability of oblivion seems to get closer everyday.

Posted: Oct. 20

Don’t blame Trump for neo-Nazis

By Jamie Black, Section Editor

Don’t shoot the messenger, but the riots, neo-Nazis and white supremacists in Charlottesville aren’t President Trump’s fault.

Let’s get one thing clear here, I’m Jewish and I hate Nazis. If I truly believed Trump had anything to do with Nazis, I wouldn’t be writing this article.

With that put to rest, let’s address what occurred. On Aug. 11 , those against the removal of confederate General Robert E. Lee’s statue protested in Charlottesville. By the end of the night, there was clashing among the protesters and the counter-protesters, who were in favor of the statue’s removal.

The fighting sparked outrage, and a lot of the outrage blamed Trump calling the attendance of neo-Nais and white supremacists “Trump’s America.”

News flash: Nazis and white supremacists existed before Trump was in power!

The KKK was formed in 1865, and the atrocities members have committed have not become forgotten, but it seems as if people think what occurred in Charlottesville was the KKK’s and the neo-Nazis’ rebirth.

Yes, the lynchings might have stopped, but it doesn’t mean the KKK disappeared. All they did was take off their masks and tell the neo-Nazis to hide their swastikas.

Maybe some can argue that Trump and Republicans are promoting or indirectly promoting neo-Nazis and the KKK suddenly appearing, but let me ask you this, when black men were getting lynched in the South, were there Democrats in office?

Yes there were. Neo-nazis and the KKK are not a partisan issue. I hope we can understand that these idiots with the brain capacity of birds are horrible, closed-minded pieces of scum, and we don’t need politics to figure that out.

Leave the politics out of this, and maybe instead ask a minority affected by these hate groups how they are. Do they feel safe? Or even, are they glad to be able to see the face behind the mask?

Trump is not the biggest issue here. Yes, he has said some things or tweeted things that might encourage hateful behavior, (this being documented and compiled together by the Huffington Post) but the neo-nazis and white supremacists are the real problem here.

Posted Sept. 27


%d bloggers like this: